The Black Carbon Finance Study Group (BCFSG), led by the World Bank Group and United Nations Environment Programme’s Finance Initiative with support from the CCAC, investigated ways to scale up financing and investments for black carbon mitigation. Its new report identifies existing funds and potential financial mechanisms that could attract more funding and outlines strategies for scaling up in future.
The BCFSG, comprised of 30-40 experts with backgrounds in operations, policy, science and finance, began its working sessions in June 2014. Their main mission was to identify priority sectors to focus on, key investment opportunities, and the potential financing mechanisms to lower black carbon emissions.
As a result, two black carbon intense sectors (domestic cooking and heavy diesel) were recognized as mature enough to attract public and private sector financing, and had sufficient performance standards to measure progress. While it was not in the working group’s mandate to identify performance metrics they determined that having clear ways of measuring black carbon abatement is crucial to attract funding.
In a global context, It is increasingly recognized that the tourism sector can make a major contribution to the green economy through more sustainable practices, climate change mitigation and ecotourism. The role of tourism sector will continue to be crucial in the post-2015 sustainable development agenda too. However, there are ambiguities about how tourism and allied industries can maximize their contribution to human well-being and ensure environmentally sustainability, embracing issues of political economy, geography and business ethics.
In the past decade, the growing realization that biodiversity and human wellbeing are inextricably linked has led to the adoption of numerous environmental policies. The concept of the green economy has gained particular attention as an economic system where growth is possible within environmental limits. The preservation of ecosystem services and the halt of biodiversity loss are identified as key pillars of the green economy. Despite the concept’s momentum there is still no clear understanding of how biodiversity fits within a green economy. In the current debate, biodiversity is rarely acknowledged in economic sectors other than agriculture, forestry, fisheries and tourism, and when it is acknowledged biodiversity and its conservation feature more as buzzwords than as concrete and tangible components of the green economy. This book aims to identify, understand and offer pragmatic recommendations of how biodiversity conservation can become an agent of green economic development. This book establishes ways to assess biodiversity’s contributions to the economy and to meaningfully integrate biodiversity concerns in green-economy policies.
India has ambitious renewable energy targets for 2022, but because of the government’s limited budget, a cost-effective policy path is crucial to achieving those targets. Achieving India’s renewable energy targets cost-effectively faces two key barriers – a shortage of debt and inferior terms of debt. Reducing the cost of foreign debt in other currencies is one solution. By lowering the cost of capital, reducing the currency hedging cost could mobilize foreign capital and spur investments in renewable energy. If the expected cost of the foreign exchange (FX) hedging facility is borne by the government, the cost of debt for the developer can be reduced by 7 percentage points, the cost of renewable energy by 19%, and the cost of government support by 54%. If the expected cost of the FX hedging facility is passed onto the developer, the cost of debt can be reduced by 3.5 percentage points, the cost of renewable energy by 9%, and the cost of government support by 33%.
Climate change is expected to increase risks to businesses, infrastructure, assets and economies. Understanding how to involve the private sector in responding to these risks – or encouraging them to take advantage of the new business opportunities that may arise from changing climate conditions – is crucial to catalyze greater investment in activities that increase countries, businesses, and communities’ resilience.
The perceived potential of clean energy to support employment in the post-crisis recovery context has led several OECD and emerging economies to design green industrial policies aimed at protecting domestic manufacturers, notably through local-content requirements (LCRs). These typically require solar or wind developers to source a specific share of jobs, components or costs locally. Such requirements have been designed or implemented in the solar- and wind-energy sectors in at least 21 countries, including 16 OECD countries and emerging economies, mostly since 2009.
Empirical evidence gathered in this report shows however that LCRs have actually hindered international investment across the solar PV and wind-energy value chains, by increasing the cost of inputs for downstream activities. This report also takes stock of other measures that can restrict international investment in solar PV and wind energy, such as trade remedies and technical barriers. This report provides policy makers with evidence-based analysis to guide their decisions in designing clean-energy support policies.