Browse Research

Sort by
Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System (UN Environment Inquiry)

The State of Sustainable Finance in the United States discusses the topography of financial sector surrounding the sustainable momentum in the US. While US financial institutions have at times enjoyed a reputation of being something of a laggard on sustainability issues versus their European counterparts, significant changes and innovations are under way which are beginning to drive meaningful change. 

Record levels of awareness on sustainability issues in the US, including from millennials, are accelerating activities such as:

  • Increased levels of sustainable and responsible investing.
  • An increased focus from the largest US banks and other financial institutions on sustainability risks, lending practices and related opportunities.
  • US insurance companies and related regulators are also developing and evolving sustainability risk frameworks.
  • Federal and State policies are accelerating the ongoing US low carbon energy transition.

Financial innovation is driving meaningful change in many investment sectors while social innovation and culture development also continue to evolve.

Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System (UN Environment Inquiry)

Making the Jump: How crises affect policy consensus and can trigger paradigm shift outlines the dynamics behind the financial regulatory paradigm shift that began in 2008-2009. It seeks to identify parallels with and differences from the slower moving, even more consequential, global climate change crisis, and the fitful, still under way, policy paradigm shift that the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and other stakeholders are trying to support and facilitate linking economic sustainability, financial regulation, markets, and climate change. The following ten observations are developed in this paper:

Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System (UN Environment Inquiry)

The Equator Principles are a voluntary code of conduct and a risk management framework for determining, assessing and managing environmental and social risks in projects, such as energy or infrastructure projects. Since their foundation in 2003, they were lauded for integrating social and environmental assessment practices into project assessments. Critics reason, however, that without fundamental implementation efforts and enforcement, the Equator Principles will not contribute to any change with respect to effects of projects on sustainable development.

2 Degrees Investing Initiative

Building a Sustainable Financial System in the European Union presents a stock-take of actions under way at the European Union level and in selected Member States to align the rules governing the financial system with environmental sustainability.

Looking across the range of innovations across the EU, five broad policy priorities emerge. The central challenge of financing sustainable development in the EU is one of capital reallocation. Enhancing frameworks for risk management, clarifying the core responsibilities of financial institutions and improving reporting and disclosure across these dimensions will be necessary to fully unlock flows of sustainable finance. A growing number of Member States are delivering on individual aspects of these priorities, and others are acting within given asset classes. The debate is now advancing to the system level and the need for a strategic reset, seeking to link previously unconnected initiatives and to enhance the capacity of the financial system to support renewed economic competitiveness and improved sustainability performance.

Utrecht Sustainable Finance Lab
Since the global financial crisis, financial supervisors have developed a new macroprudential policy framework: mechanisms to identify systemic financial imbalances and instruments to address these. At the same time, a literature is rapidly developing on financial shocks that may originate from ecological imbalances, triggered by either intensified environmental policies to protect ecological boundaries or due to the economic costs of crossing these. However, financial supervisors have so far given little attention to this ecological dimension. This allows systemic financial imbalances resulting from ecological pressures to build up and concentrate in financial institutions and markets. What Role for Financial Supervisors in Addressing Systemic Environmental Risks? sketches the ecological dimension of the macroprudential policy framework and illustrates the working for the case of carbon emissions.
 
A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the UNEP Inquiry/Centre for International Governance Innovation Academic Symposium on the Design of a Sustainable Financial System, held in Waterloo (Canada) in December 2014.